Roy Ngerng received wrong advice?

2

Before the public get carried away by Roy Ngerng’s act of apologising to PM Lee three times in court yesterday, we should recap some key moments. In May last year, Roy Ngerng retracted defamatory contents he posted and issued an apology to PM Lee. But the public has forgotten that Roy Ngerng also informed the media to tell them other ways to access the removed contents in a attempt to raise awareness of his self-induced plight. That act showed Roy Ngerng was insincere in his public apology. Hence, the public should not be taken in by Roy Ngerng publicity stunt of apologising to PM Lee three times in court yesterday.

To deal with the lawsuit, Roy Ngerng sought funds last year from netizens who thought they are looking at a handsome young man who could rescue their CPF. More than $100,000 have been raised but the monies were used for his overseas trips to Scandivanian countries and United Kingdom.

To Singaporeans’ disappointment, Roy Ngerng visited Reporter without Borders, gave talks in international forums, and even met up with NS defaulter Tan Wah Piow to seek legal opinion.
Prior to meeting Tan, Roy Ngerng was actively learning from Leong Sze Hian, a statistician whose educational qualifications were doubted. What was the outcome of learning from Leong? Roy produced more confusing graphs even my qualified accountant friend can’t make any sense of.

But looking at the sinkhole Roy Ngerng is in now, I wonder what form of advice Roy Ngerng has received from Tan Wah Piow? Remember it was Tan who first advocated “Virtual Movement for Democracy in Cyberspace” by seeking more “guerrilla-type bloggers and cyber-warriors” to challenge the status quo which would erode the support towards PAP [1]. Then we saw Roy Ngerng writing for TRS, and getting himself into more limelight by hiring and firing of his legal counsels, but yet applied through the courts to admit a Queen’s Counsel to defend his case? All his actions got the attention of news-starved competitive international media that are more than eager to tell the world that Singapore adores Kim Jong Un and wear down Singapore’s image.

Roy Ngerng is trying to milk the limelight for as long as possible to set himself as an example to tell Singaporeans that this country is undemocratic, and this country is a shit hole; and only by voting out the oppressive PAP can this country be saved.

What do you think? Are Singaporeans that naive? Maybe yes, you know. since nobody asked about the $100,000 worth of donations. LOL

[1] The real reason behind the Internet Crackdown by Tan Wah Piow,

Chiam See Tong Cannot Make It

Auntie Lina Chiam, Uncle Chiam See Tong, despite your age and experience in politics, both of you are poor judges of character.

Years ago, Uncle Chiam inducted Chee Soon Juan into SDP which you’ve founded. Singaporeans know what happened after.

Auntie Chiam once said Alex Tan was “like his godson” after he joined SPP. What happened to Alex Tan? He played a major role in TRS and ran off to Australia but still keen to stir shit in Singapore. Did you, as a godmother to Alex Tan, stopped him? No. You didn’t. Why are you endorsing your godson?

In 2015, co-founder of TOC, Remy Choo Zheng Xi was seen involved in SPP’s walkabouts.
Uncle Chiam, good luck to your position of Secretary-General because Remy is eyeing that position. Are you oblivious to it? You have no power to stop it. Your SPP is the shortcut for his political stardom.

Your party is the weakest link in opposition politics. Due to your age, your naive wife, and your poor judgement of character in those you have endorsed so far will ensure the destruction of your party.

TOC benefits the most from the fall of ‘The Real Singapore’

[Photo from TNP.sg] Ai Takagi, an Australian and Yang Kai Heng, a Singaporean were speculated to be the owners of TRS.

TRS is now in trouble with the law but it is business as usual for them. But the facts that foreigners are running TRS under the tagline “voices of average Singaporeans” while earning lucrative monies from digital advertisment by leeching on grouses of Singaporeans & fabricating stories did not go down well with majority of Singaporeans.

The public can only speculate what might happen to TRS if its owners, Yang Kai Heng, a Singaporean, and Ai Takagi, an Australian got charged and convicted.

Regardless of the outcome, The Online Citizen (TOC) stands to benefit the most.

Andrew Loh is a former member of Workers’ Party (WP).

TOC is the 2nd largest social-political site in Singapore. It was founded in 2006 by Andrew Loh and Remy Choo Zheng Xi. Despite its long history, it did not gain popularity among Singaporeans because they did not focus on bread and butter issues but prefer to raise awareness on the application of western liberal ideas in Singapore. Their topics are boring, stale, WOT and did not resonate with many.

I believe TOC has a group of full-time writers, namely, Andrew Loh, Howard Lee and Terry Xu. I have no idea how they survive on TOC alone. Its founding member Remy Choo, a lawyer, definitely has his hands full and more interested in building up his own reputation. (Google for “Remy Choo Zheng Xi” and note the number of times he has been quoted in the media! Remy seems to be media darling these days.)

Remy Choo receives direct phone calls from Law Minister K Shanmugam.

TOC is known to dislike TRS. In November 2013, TRS published an expose by one “Vettel” who cried foul of Twelve Cupcake’s exploitation of its foreign workers. The expose turned out to be anything but true. But, TOC gleefully latched onto the story to highlight the atrocities of TRS and its past behaviours. [http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2013/11/twelve-cupcakes-refutes-accusations/ ] .

The downfall of TRS will push TOC to be the number 1 socio-political site in Singapore. This potentially translates to more ad-revenue for TOC to reward its full-time staff. TOC founding editors Remy Choo and Andrew Loh can finally pop a bottle of campagne to celebrate this victory (against TRS).

SINGAPORE DEMOCRATIC PARTY (SDP) USES “THE REAL SINGAPORE” TO SPREAD LIES

Remember what happened between Jeremy Chen and SDP? Do you remember SDP exclusively uses TRS as a platform to share their anti-Singapore views and attacked ex-member Jeremy Chen?

Now we know why. Can SDP care to explain? Can SDP explain why they are using a site that is run by Australians to push their agenda?

Resharing my old post –

Singapore Democratic Party Assistant Secretary General Christopher Ang has responded to its former member Jeremy Chen who left the party over some disagreements. Jeremy Chen is not the first SDP member who left on acrimonious terms – before him, there’s Jarrod Luo, the former SDP youth wing chief.

Christopher Ang explained that the party was unhappy with the “offensive” Facebook postings by Jeremy. Those postings have violated the code of conduct which the party expects from its members. In the lengthy response, Mr Ang has painstakingly posted the screenshots of the “offensive” postings which Jeremy have made.

The SDP tried hard to swing the negative opinions that it has with the general public – On the ground, they have begun their walkabouts with cute mascots and portrayed themselves to residents that they are a viable alternative. On social media, they prepared slick interview videos and marketed themselves impressively online to project their message to young web savvy Singaporeans.

SDP may have successfully delivered their message to the masses. In Jeremy Chen’s case, the party has to contain the damage from the fallout, since they are aware that social media can work against them which could hamper their political outreach on the ground.

But I question the medium which the SDP has used to slam Jeremy Chen – Christopher Ang’s rebuttal piece was not posted on SDP’s website, neither did it appear on its Facebook page. Miraculously, the piece appeared on The Real Singapore, a site with extremely low credibility and known for its anti-Singapore stance. The piece has also appeared on TRE, another anti-Singapore site.

This is an indicator of SDP’s dubious nature. They are not keen to ensure that their message appear on the right, proper channel such as their official website but they are desperate to get its message out to the masses through anti-Singapore channels. Not only should Singaporeans should question their use of such channels and its affiliations with such channels, Singaporeans must also press SDP on their views on TRS: Is SDP for or against TRS?

I am not surprised if SDP submits other hate pieces to TRS anonymously to suit its own political agenda.

DUBIOUS SINGAPORE DEMOCRATIC PARTY (SDP)

[Photo – HK TAN]

Singapore Democratic Party Assistant Secretary General Christopher Ang has responded to its former member Jeremy Chen who left the party over some disagreements. Jeremy Chen is not the first SDP member who left on acrimonious terms – before him, there’s Jarrod Luo, the former SDP youth wing chief.

Christopher Ang explained that the party was unhappy with the “offensive” Facebook postings by Jeremy. Those postings have violated the code of conduct which the party expects from its members. In the lengthy response, Mr Ang has painstakingly posted the screenshots of the “offensive” postings which Jeremy have made.

The SDP tried hard to swing the negative opinions that it has with the general public – On the ground, they have begun their walkabouts with cute mascots and portrayed themselves to residents that they are a viable alternative. On social media, they prepared slick interview videos and marketed themselves impressively online to project their message to young web savvy Singaporeans.

SDP may have successfully delivered their message to the masses. In Jeremy Chen’s case, the party has to contain the damage from the fallout, since they are aware that social media can work against them which could hamper their political outreach on the ground.

But I question the medium which the SDP has used to slam Jeremy Chen – Christopher Ang’s rebuttal piece was not posted on SDP’s website, neither did it appear on its Facebook page. Miraculously, the piece appeared on The Real Singapore, a site with extremely low credibility and known for its anti-Singapore stance. The piece has also appeared on TRE, another anti-Singapore site.

This is an indicator of SDP’s dubious nature. They are not keen to ensure that their message appear on the right, proper channel such as their official website but they are desperate to get its message out to the masses through anti-Singapore channels. Not only should Singaporeans should question their use of such channels and its affiliations with such channels, Singaporeans must also press SDP on their views on TRS: Is SDP for or against TRS?

I am not surprised if SDP submits other hate pieces to TRS anonymously to suit its own political agenda.

WHY IS LEE CHEUK-YAN, A POLITICIAN FROM HONG KONG INTERESTED IN SINGAPORE SMRT BUS STRIKES?

The ongoing tension in Hong Kong between pro-democracy group and HKSAR government over the future administration of Hong Kong is partly sustained by Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Union(HKCTU), an independent union movement in Hong Kong.

Singaporeans are not aware that the Secretary-General of HKCTU, Mr Lee Cheuk-Yan, once led a protest in Singapore Consulate in Hong Kong in December 2012. That protest demanded Singapore government for the immediate release of the SMRT bus drivers who were involved in the strike in November 2012.

Lee is now being accused of being funded by International Labor Solidarity, an organization under National Endowment for Democracy (NED). It is open knowledge that NED receives its funding from U.S Department of State.

Jolovan Wham managed to instigate Panasonic factory workers to gather for a sit-in protest outside Ministry of Manpower in 2012, and he was actively involved in “fighting” for the rights of SMRT bus drivers who were involved in the illegal protest.

Why is Lee, a Hong Konger and a politician interested in SMRT bus strikes?

What is the connection between Wham and Lee and SDP and the State Department of United States?

WEEKEND ENTERTAINMENT IN HONG LIM PARK

WEEKEND ENTERTAINMENT IN HONG LIM PARK.

HOW COME SINGAPORE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ALLOW FOREIGNERS TO PROTEST IN HONG LIM PARK?

HOW COME SINGAPORE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ALLOW FOREIGNERS TO PROTEST IN HONG LIM PARK?

MARTYN SEE TONG MING AKA SINGAPORE REBEL MAKING FRIENDS WITH SDP

MARTYN SEE SINGAPOREREBEL

“Martyn See don’t like police, but want police to investigate the former Johor minister.

Complaint against former Johor minister for importing Malaysian politics into Singapore; but supported a Hong Lim Park event about Malaysian politics?”

“If YOUR conscience is clear, why fear the ISA? Martyn See did not refute the violence acts that the communists have committed in the past. How many of you have grandparents or parents who have lived through the era? Their encounters are real. Martyn See also did not address the violent acts of modern terrorists. Despite the hard (and sad) truth that Worker’s Party have won Aljunied GRC through the ballots, Martyn See continue to assert that the voters were denied proper voting rights. It appears that Martyn See is following the footsteps of Dr Chee – desperately trying to gain the attention from the public and he did so by flouting laws to get his days in Court.

Very lengthy post by Martyn See: singaporerebel.blogspot.sg/2013/12/50-years-under-paps-grip.html

“

SOLIDARITY WITH MALAYSIANS

JOLOVAN WHAM VINCENT WIJEYSINGHA SOLIDARITY WITH MALAYSIANS

“Now that the Malaysian protesters are punished for their actions in Merlion park, what will SDP’s Jolovan Wham do next? Will Jolovan, in usual SDP style, hold another protest to protest the punishment? Or will he instigate others (the usual SDP style) to hold protest to protest the punishments? I wonder how many Malaysians listened to SDP & Jolovan’s advice.

Reference:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=503755279680485&set=a.471835549539125.115935.213440582045291&type=1&theater”